Click here to Home
Page
Amendments To Singapore Patent Law
New/amended Patents Act/Rules are finally
being implemented with effect from 14 February 2014.
The Singapore Patents Amendments 2014
includes the following:
1.
Abolition of the Dual Track (Fast track/Slow track) patent
prosecution options;
2. Shifting the existing "self-assessment" patent system
to new "positive grant" patent system;
3. Introduction of Review procedures for unfavourable
Examination Report; and
4. Introducting a new supplementary examination process
for patent applications that rely on a
positive foreign search and examination report.
All patent
applications filed after 14 February 2014 would be prosecuted
under the new regime. Patent
applications filed before this
date would continue to be prosecuted under the old “ Dual Track
System”.
There is no option for existing patent applications to
be switched to prosecution under the new regime.
1.
Abolition of the Dual Track (Fast track/Slow track) patent
prosecution options:
These prosecution options although introduced
to cater to give foreign applicants flexibility in going for
grant
were often perceived as confusing and now have been
withdrawn.
New Timelines:
With the new amendments, fast track and slow
track prosecution procedures have been removed. That is,
prosecution of applications under the “positive grant system”
will have only one single track and there is only
one
prosecution track.
Please see “ Flowchart of Singapore Patent
Prosecution effective 14 Feb 2014” attached.
A patent application would have 54 months
from Filing Date/Declared Priority Date (whichever is earlier)
to be
put in order for grant.
Extension of time (of up to 18 months) is
available to applicants, as of right, to obtain grant upon
reaching
54th month from Filing Date/Declared
Priority Date. For extension of time beyond 72nd
Month from Filing Date
/Declared Priority Date, applicants would
have to apply to the Registrar, with grounds for the
extension.
2. Positive Grant Patent System:
Under the existing “self-assessment”, a
patent applicant is under no obligation to amend his application
at any
stage, even if the patentability of the invention is not favourable, meaning that when the applicant faces an
unfavourable examiner’s opinion and/or report, amendments are
not needed for the application to be proceeded
to grant. A
Singapore patent shall be issued once the formal requirements
are met and upon the completion of
one of the search and
examination procedures (there are pluralities of examination
routes for applicant to choose).
In other words, the
establishment of an adverse examination report will not prevent
an application from proceeding
to grant.
With the change to a “ Positive Grant System
“, the “self-assessment” patent system will be replaced with
the
“ Positive Grant System “. Under the Positive Grant
System, only patent applications which meets patentability
criteria can be granted. Applications with claims that do not
possess novelty, inventive step and industrial
applicability
will no longer be able to proceed to grant.
This amendment to positive grant is to bring
Singapore patent practice in line with patent practice of
most
developed countries. Obviously, this should also bring
the country’s IP regime to parity with other established
patent
offices such as the UK Intellectual Property Office, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Japan
Patent Office and the
European Patent Office.
The change is intended to raise the quality
of Singapore-granted patents and will enhance Singapore’s
standing
in the IP industry. The move of the change to a
positive grant patent system shall reduce the granting of weak
patents thus enhances the quality of the patents to be granted
in Singapore.
In supporting the move to a “positive grant”
system, fundamental changes have been made to the search and
examination provisions of the Patents Act.
2.1 Search and Examination Procedures under
new regime:
A Singapore patent application will still
have three possible routes to proceed to grant – i.e. local
examination
route, foreign examination route and mixed routes.
For all routes, all claims must be searched and examined
and
the application be issued with Notice of Eligibility before the
application can proceed to grant. The three
routes for grant
are:
Option 1(a) - Search followed by
examination with the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore
(local examination route).
Option 1(b) - Combined search and
examination with the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore
(local examination route).
Option 1(c) - Examination together with a
copy of search report from corresponding applications
(mixed
route).
Option 1(d) - Filing request for
Supplementary Examination relying on the final search and
examination results
or grant of corresponding
applications/corresponding International Application/ Related
National Phase Application
(foreign examination route).
Option 1(e) - Filing request for
Supplementary Examination relying on favourable IPRP
[International Preliminary
Report on Patentability - Chap I or
Chap II] (foreign examination route).
Definition of “ Related National Phase
Application “:
Under the new amendments, a foreign national
phase application from a PCT application without any priority
claim
will be considered a Related National Phase Application of
a Singapore national phase application.
Please refer to “ Flowchart of Singapore
Patent Prosecution effective 14 Feb 2014”.
2.2 Requirement for Grant:
Regardless of choice of route, a positive
Examination Report or positive Supplementary Examination Report
must
be established in order for the IPOS to issue a Notice of
Eligibility. The applicant is required to comply with the
requirements for a patent grant within 2 months upon issue of
Notice of Eligibility. This will be the final stage
in the
prosecution of the Singapore application.
2.3 Notice of Intention to Refuse:
Applications with objected claims or any
other non-compliance matters will be issued with a Notice of
Intention
to Refuse. At this stage, the applicant has a final
option to proceed the application. The Applicant may within
2
months from the date of the Notice of Intention to Refuse, to
apply for a review of the unfavourable examination report. In
the event that no request for review is filed, IPOS will issue a
Notice of Refusal for the application and
this will be the end
of the prosecution of the Singapore application.
Notes :
a.
The 2 months
deadline can be extended to maximum of six (6) months.
b.
Applicants can also consider filing a
divisional application, instead.
c.
Notice of Refusal will be back dated to
Notice of Intention to Refuse.
3. Review Procedure for unfavourable
Examination Report:
In the event that the Applicant is not
satisfied with the Notice of Intention to Refuse, the Applicant
can file
application for a Review. For this Review,
Applicants may file written submissions and/or amendments to
overcome the objections raised in the unfavourable Examination
Report. The Official Fee for the Review would
be S$1350
(US$1080). If Applicant is not able to file request for Review
within the deadline of two months,
it is possible to apply for
an extension of time up to 6 months with payment of extension
fees.
For the Review, a different Examiner (from
the Examiner who handled the application) will be appointed.
The unfavourable Examination Report, all written
submissions/arguments and the amendments (if any) will be
reviewed by the Examiner. A Review Report will be issued
stating the Examiner’s decision. The Review Report
will be
accompanied by a final Notice of Eligibility or a Notice of
Refusal. If a Notice of Refusal is issued,
the application
cannot proceed further. However, Applicants can also consider
filing a divisional application then.
If a Notice of
Eligibility is issued, the applicant is required to comply with
the requirements for a patent grant,
within 2 months of such
Notice of Eligibility.
4 Supplementary Examination:
For the above routes – Option 1(d) and 1(e) -
relying on the final search and examination results of
corresponding applications or a corresponding international
application or a related national phase application or a PCT
application,
the Singapore application must now undergo
Supplementary Examination. This would ensure all claims are
patentable before proceeding for grant. (Previously there was
no requirement for examination as it was a
“ Self assessment
system “.)
The due date to request for a Supplementary
Examination Report is 54 months from the Filing Date/Declared
Priority Date. Upon filing request for a Supplementary
Examination Report, one Written Opinion may be issued. Applicant
is required to respond within 3 months of which the due date is
non-extendable.
4.1 Table of related claims:
The request for supplementary examination
must be accompanied by a table showing how each claim in the
application is related to the allowed claim in the final results
of the corresponding application, corresponding
international
application or related national phase application, or IPRP.
4.2 Extension of time to file Supplementary
Examination:
If the results of examination of a
corresponding application or corresponding international
application or related
national phase application is not
available by 54th Month from Filing Date/Declared
Priority Date, an extension
of time (of up to 18 months) is
available to applicants, as of right. For extension of time
beyond 72nd Month
from Filing Date/Declared Priority
Date, applicants would have to apply to the Registrar, with
grounds for the
extension.
Conclusion
The changes are favourable to foreign
applicants as it will enhance enforceability of a granted
Singapore patent
with more certainty. Therefore, foreign
applicants would be able to achieve better protection of their
patent
rights in Singapore.
We hope that you find our Patent Law Summary
useful.
If you have any queries, please do not
hesitate to contact either:-
YF Chong (yfchong@wenpingsingapore.com)
or Alex Tan (alextan@wenpingsingapore.com)
W. P. LAI & COMPANY
SINGAPORE & MALAYSIA

|